Create each Site's network with its own subnet
The deploy failed on hngmohali with 'all predefined address pools have been fully subnetted': every 172.17-172.30/16 is in use, 172.31/16 is the host's own VPC so Docker will not allocate from it, and all sixteen 192.168.0-240/20 blocks are taken. Docker therefore refuses a network created without a subnet. Each Site now names a free network_subnet (10.210.0.0/16, one /24 each), the role looks the network up first and only creates it when it is absent and with that subnet, and it fails with an explanation when a Site declares none. Existing networks are left alone, because Docker cannot change a subnet in place and the Sites already running have theirs. The test checks every Site declares one, and the deployment readme says a new Site needs a free subnet. deploy.sh now deploys every Site by default, with SITE=<name> to narrow it, which is what the local edit was reaching for.
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
33a8d56e8b
commit
01ce0bd609
8 files changed
+52
-5
No files matched your search
@@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ describe('every Site in the inventory is complete', () => {
|
||||
assert.match(varsRaw, /^title: /m, `${name}: ${varFile} has no title`);
|
||||
assert.match(varsRaw, /^host: 'menu\.\{\{ title \}\}'/m, `${name}: host is not quoted`);
|
||||
assert.match(varsRaw, /^app_root: /m, `${name}: no app_root`);
|
||||
// Without this the play fails on a host whose Docker pools are full.
|
||||
assert.match(varsRaw, /^network_subnet: /m, `${name}: no network_subnet`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user